Monday May 27,
2013
- The African Union accuses the International Criminal
Court of "race hunting" - meaning that only African
leaders are targeted as desperate attempts are made to
protect new Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta from
justice. Oh the wheels of justice. They sometimes appear
to move too slowly in addressing the grievances of
surviving victims but as sure as daylight they always
get there and Uhuru Kenyatta will have his day in court.
This is not a matter of African politics. It is a matter
of international justice when impunity is encouraged in
African countries by African governments.
The AU chair and Ethiopian Prime
Minister Hailemariam Desalegn believed he was speaking
on behalf of Africa when in his closing statement at the
end of the 21st session of the summit of the African
Union accused the International Criminal Court, the ICC,
of what he would like to call "race hunting" (simply put
racist) citing his observation that some 99 percent of
the cases pursued by the international court involved
Africans. And this statement was supposed to have been
from the hearts of African leaders who after fifty years
of the founding of the pan-African body still cannot
define what they should be doing to respect the rights
of their own citizens as defined and laid out in the
Charter of the African Union.
Prime Minister Desalegn's
statement, we believe buttresses our suspicion all along
that despite indicted ICC suspect Uhuru Kenyatta
commitment and assurances that he would co-operate with
the ICC to clear his family name (his father Jomo
Kenyatta was the first leader of an independent Kenya in
1963), he was all along in actual fact plotting,
together with his type at the African Union to defeat
justice by raising the race card. We however note that
in his closing remarks published on the African Union
website, there is no such stance taken by the Ethiopian
Prime Minister which has raised a number of worrying
questions over the sincerity of the man who now takes
over as Chairman for a whole year of the body, not the
governing body, but the club of African "leaders"
It is worth noting that even
before the accusation of the Ethiopian Prime Minister,
Amnesty International, a rights group had warned on 24th
May that African Union leaders must reject Kenya's lans
to allow accused political leaders to escape justice. In
a statement,
African Union: Reject Kenya’s
attempt to shield its leaders from accountability
noted that -
"The Organisation of African
Unity, the AU’s predecessor organisation, was
founded to end the innumerable human rights
violations meted out on Africans through the yoke of
colonialism. Today, the AU must stand firm with the
victims of human rights violations allegedly
perpetrated by their own leaders. It is a shame that
the Kenyan government’s predominant concern is the
protection of its leaders from the ICC. At no point
before the United Nations or the AU has the Kenyan
government mentioned the needs of the victims of the
2007-2008 violence, their cries for justice,
reparations and guarantees of non-repetition. The
current initiative follows an effort earlier this
month by Kenya's Ambassador to the United Nations
for the UN Security Council to terminate the cases
against Kenyan President Kenyatta and Vice-President
Ruto. This is another worrying attempt by the Kenyan
authorities to avoid justice. This initiative lacks
any legal basis and will not result in the Trial
Chamber of the ICC deferring the trial before it.
Kenya’s diplomatic offensive is nothing more than an
attack on the work of the International Criminal
Court.”
The BBC reported on
this statement and actually broadcast the words of the
Ethiopian Prime Minister as he tried to justify why he
and his type view the international court as racist,
never mentioning the fact that had African government
got free and unfettered justice systems in place, there
would have been no need to refer such cases to the ICC.
Indeed it is worth noting
a report in the internationally-renowned Kenya Daily
Nation newspaper in which the International Criminal
Court made a swift response -
"The International
Criminal Court (ICC) has said it will ignore
African Union (AU) resolutions on President
Uhuru Kenyatta and deputy William Ruto cases,
emphasising the court is not bound by political
decisions. The AU said ICC is targeting Africans
on a racial basis on Monday, as the continental
bloc urged crimes against humanity trials for
Kenya's leaders be moved to their home country.
The Hague based court on Monday denied an
African Union charge that it was racist and said
it would not respond to an AU call for Kenyan
leaders' crimes against humanity trials to be
moved to their home country. "The International
Criminal Court will not be reacting to African
Union resolutions," ICC spokesman Fadi El
Abdallah."
We have observed that
despite the brouhaha over the International Criminal
Court, the ICC, there was not a word on this in
the final press statement
published on the website of the African Union. Was
the statement by the Ethiopian Prime Minister merely
to please the government of Kenya participants at
the 50th anniversary summit?
We have also noted a
statement from the AU Chairman South Africa's
Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma the first woman to lead the
continent - and the first from southern Africa -
since the AU's predecessor was founded in 1963
stating that the Kenyan elections were conducted in
a very calm atmosphere, that appeals were lodged,
decisions made by Kenyan courts and that all was
well with the Kenyan system of justice. The poor
lady quite forgot to mention that had it not been
for the ICC threat of prosecution hanging over those
accused of the 2007 post-elections violence, there
was bound to be a repeat of the violence which
claimed more than a thousand Kenyan lives and up
till now still leaves thousands, if not millions
displaced from their usual place of abode before
that violence.
We could not miss that,
unlike what we predicted, Sierra Leone's smoke and
mirrors occupier of State House kept well away from
the corridors of the 50th anniversary celebrations
in Addis Ababa.
Was he in fear of
repercussions over his support of those who tried to
enslave Sierra Leoneans by staging a very bloody and
unpopular coup on 25th May 1997 - Africa Liberation
Day?
|